Take that, Bell’s Inequality!
نویسنده
چکیده
Bell’s inequality was tested using the CHSH method. Entangled photons were produced from two different laser beams by passing light from Type I BBO crystals and detected using avalanche photodiodes. Values for S as high as 2.30 were obtained. Background One of the major differences between quantum mechanics and previous physical theories is its probabilistic nature. If the state of a classical system is completely known at some time then, in principle, it is possible to develop equations of motion for that system that will determine the values for any observable quantity at any time in the future. However, the most that quantum mechanical equations of motion can provide is the probability that a given observable will take a particular value. This led some of the pioneers of the field to suspect that quantum mechanics was an incomplete theory, and that there were other, ”hidden”, variables that would allow one to completely determine the final state of a quantum system in the same way as a classical one. In support of this view, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosenberg proposed a thought experiment in 1936 using the phenomenon of entanglement. Quantum mechanics allows two particles that interact with each other to be put into a state in which the two particles cannot be treated as separate entities. Measurements of a property of one of the particles will still be probabilistic according to quantum mechanics, but they will be absolutely correlated with properties of the other particle. This condition persists even if the particles are subsequently separated from each other. The argument is this, then: assuming the laws of physics are locally deterministic, that is, that the behavior of an isolated system will only depend on the state of the system, then any correlation between two isolated systems must be the result of some other information stored in the two systems. In other words, since two entangled particles separated by a large distance cannot communicate with each other, there must be some hidden variables responsible for the correlations seen when the particles are measured. Since the wave functions of quantum mechanics do not provide this information, quanum mechanics must be an incomplete theory. In 1964, John Stewart Bell published a method to determine the validity of this argument. He showed that, in any physical system governed by local variables, the correlations
منابع مشابه
Bell’s inequality: Physics meets Probability
In this review we remind the viewpoint that violation of Bell’s inequality might be interpreted not only as an evidence of the alternative – either nonlocality or “death of reality” (under the assumption the quantum mechanics is incomplete). Violation of Bell’s type inequalities is a well known sufficient condition of incompatibility of random variables – impossibility to realize them on a sing...
متن کاملNon-Kolmogorov probability models and modified Bell’s inequality
We analyse the proof of Bell’s inequality and demonstrate that this inequality is related to one particular model of probability theory, namely Kolmogorov measure-theoretical axiomatics, 1933. We found a (numerical) statistical correction to Bell’s inequality. Such an additional term ǫφ in the right hand side of Bell’s inequality can be considered as a probability invariant of a quantum state φ...
متن کاملLocality and Bell's Inequality
WARNING This is a revised version with respect to the one submitted on Mon, 3 Jul 2000. By mistake an earlier version and not the final one was submitted. Abstract We prove that the locality condition is irrelevant to Bell in equality. We check that the real origin of the Bell’s inequality is the assumption of applicability of classical (Kolmogorovian) probability theory to quantum mechanics. W...
متن کاملQuantum Nonlocality and Inseparability
wK = 1. A necessary condition for separability is derived and is shown to be more sensitive than Bell’s inequality for detecting quantum inseparability. Moreover, collective tests of Bell’s inequality (namely, tests that involve several composite systems simultaneously) may sometimes lead to a violation of Bell’s inequality, even if the latter is satisfied when each composite system is tested s...
متن کاملBell’s inequality for conditional probabilities as a test for quantum-like behaviour of mind
We define quantum-like probabilistic behaviour as behaviour which is impossible to describe by using the classical probability model. We discuss the conjecture that cognitive behaviour is quantum-like. There is presented the scheme for an experimental test for quantum-like cognitive behaviour based on a generalization of the famous Bell’s inequality. This generalization is an analogue of Bell’s...
متن کاملBell ’ s inequality is violated in classical systems as well as quantum systems by Shiro
Bell’s inequality itself is usually considered to belong to mathematics and not quantum mechanics. We think that this is making our understanding of Bell’ theory be confused. Thus in this paper, contrary to Bell’s spirit (which inherits Einstein’s spirit), we try to discuss Bell’s inequality in the framework of quantum theory with the linguistic Copenhagen interpretation. And we clarify that th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011